🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to reinitiate nuclear discussions with the United States on condition that it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said solely negotiations was effective, and disclosed recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the UN nuclear inspectorate to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Route

The foreign minister is navigating a complex route since Iran wishes not to appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium domestically that it will never give up" – the primary cause of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The earlier sessions of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader claiming the sites had been destroyed. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had reached a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the talks that American atomic experts could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats asserted on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in some form if discussions resume.

The American leader last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from the United States either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to portray the US as a controlling nation that misuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi said the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to reestablish.

Negotiations Remains the Primary Resolution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had abandoned diplomacy; it was America and the Western nations that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the final solution to address conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent approach."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of repair and recovery, the foreign minister claimed he was certain Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We acquired multiple understandings from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We managed to survive this conflict. Our enrichment knowledge, which they planned to destroy, stays intact. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more integrated, and more backing of the administration and the country in the face of this attack."